<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fallacy Of The Inverse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simonashari.com/the-fallacy-of-the-inverse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simonashari.com/the-fallacy-of-the-inverse/</link>
	<description>The blog and diary of Simon Ashari</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:21:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://simonashari.com/the-fallacy-of-the-inverse/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonashari.com/?p=48#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Cheers for the heads up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers for the heads up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://simonashari.com/the-fallacy-of-the-inverse/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 01:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonashari.com/?p=48#comment-286</guid>
		<description>My discrete math book (Rosen 1995) seems to think that the fallacy of the inverse is called &quot;the fallacy of denying the hypothesis&quot; instead. Wikipedia, on the other hand, calls it &quot;the fallacy of denying the antecedent,&quot; which appears to be the most popular name.
(For the benefit of anyone wanting to cite it in a discussion.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My discrete math book (Rosen 1995) seems to think that the fallacy of the inverse is called &#8220;the fallacy of denying the hypothesis&#8221; instead. Wikipedia, on the other hand, calls it &#8220;the fallacy of denying the antecedent,&#8221; which appears to be the most popular name.<br />
(For the benefit of anyone wanting to cite it in a discussion.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

